| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
11
   |
Posted - 2011.10.03 21:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
it wouldnt change much, older players would stomp any hope of the new players to get anywhere. Before you know it you have allainces spiling over from one universe to the other. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.03 22:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cormeas Bane wrote:Nova Fox wrote:it wouldnt change much, older players would stomp any hope of the new players to get anywhere. Before you know it you have allainces spiling over from one universe to the other. Yes but they wouldn't have the enormous skillpoint advantage over everyone else, and they wouldn't be able to hotdrop 20 nyxs on you.
And thats going to matter in 6 months?
Well let me interate.
How long does it take goonswamr to replace their entire fleet? and membership from scratch. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.03 22:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Im not talking about a real allaince btw.
Its called the goonswarm effect.
Throw enough players at it and if ithey OP the idea its a bad idea.
A hypothetical allaince or gamer clan from another gaming community moves in, they're all hardcore and they number in the multiple thosands. How long would it take to make a battleforce similar to what is being thrown around on the current server. Answer is less than 7 months. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.03 22:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Then that leaves us the question what makes it different from current servers.
Any vet will tell you SP advantage only goes so far.
As a person who did some SP capping calculations its pertty much true. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.03 23:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
you apperantly dont read before posting either concerning how ccp goes about banning bots. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 18:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:
Eve sub drop or even eve small number of subs in the first place is down to a lot of reasons ofc
Thanks for making yourself look stupid :).
?????  |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 21:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
Spr09 wrote:Sloppyslug wrote:COMM4NDER wrote:Quick answer no
Why? this will split the playerbase, lowsec/null will become even more of a desert, will create more issues on the server side to deal with the splitting etc, etc. Want to play on another server, join the Chinese one.
One of the selling points and main points. ONE server ONE universe or have I missed something? Don't neglect to see why growth of eve has been in steady state and decline, which makes your use of "selling point" redundant. Growth does not form deserts. "ONE server ONE universe or have I missed something?" Yes the test server and chinese server both undermine this. sisi is a test server, it's like a firewall for bad ideas and bugs so they dont come onto the real server. as for the china server they added that for a reason i forgot because i lost they article they explained it in. i think it was something about bots? buy a character if you want sp, otherwise you can actually play to get isk, buy a plex, get some implants, and wait for some sp. problem solved!
The chinese version of eve basically strips everything about amarrians out, mongrels the gallente, and turned the caldari into communist who like red more than blue. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
There are some real mathmateicaned t2 bpo researchers that did the number crunching and found out that invention is currently cheaper and that the money time and skills invested in t2bpos wont pay for themselves anytime soon.
Also what people (and what really determines that those who cry over tech 2 bpos dont know what they're talking about) also need to understand that tech 2 bpo research is just as bad as capitol ship bpo research, the number of item reduction isnt all that great over the many levels. even at me 1000 your looking at removeing 1 or 2 items becuase how few of them there are verses the tech 1 bpos which have millions of items to reduce from instead of 10-20 items. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 18:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sloppyslug wrote:Nova Fox wrote:There are some real mathmateicaned t2 bpo researchers that did the number crunching and found out that invention is currently cheaper and that the money time and skills invested in t2bpos wont pay for themselves anytime soon.
Also what people (and what really determines that those who cry over tech 2 bpos dont know what they're talking about) also need to understand that tech 2 bpo research is just as bad as capitol ship bpo research, the number of item reduction isnt all that great over the many levels. even at me 1000 your looking at removeing 1 or 2 items becuase how few of them there are verses the tech 1 bpos which have millions of items to reduce from instead of 10-20 items. Huh? Some of the T2 BPO horders since 2006 are considered the richest in the game. Are you saying if your lucky enough to play the game since long enough ago and notice flaws in the game which will be taken away for future players in patches deserve it? ok :).
Im saying that the BPOs hold little advantage over thier invented cousins. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 01:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
I think ammo is the only real quantifiable advantage with the BPOs but items like ships you can only build so many at once and the materials saved from advanced ME isnt noticable beyond lvl 10 until around what 100? |
| |
|